Transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis vs epithelium‐off CXL
- Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted3 studies · 203 participantsLow
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Vitrectomy led to lower adverse outcomes compared with observation; GRADE not reported.
It is very uncertain whether combined trabeculotomy with trabeculectomy changes adverse outcomes Up to 3 years compared with trabeculotomy (very low certainty).
Anti‐VEGF probably leads to lower adverse outcomes at any time point compared with steroid (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anti‐VEGF changes adverse outcomes at any time point compared with sham (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anti‐VEGF changes adverse outcomes at any time point compared with laser (very low certainty).
Transepithelial CXL probably leads to lower adverse outcomes—corneal haze or scarring compared with epithelium‐off CXL (moderate certainty).
Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy probably leads to higher adverse outcomes— hyphema Up to 1 year after surgery compared with conventional trabeculotomy (moderate certainty).
Viscotrabeculotomy showed no clear difference in adverse outcomes—hyphema Up to 6 months after surgery compared with conventional trabeculotomy (low certainty).