Question · asked by 1 review

Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment: Plaque

Population
Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries)
Intervention
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners)
Comparison
Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment
Outcome
Plaque

In randomized trials, clear aligners probably reduce plaque accumulation versus fixed appliances, though the subgroup estimate is imprecise and its CI crosses no effect (SMD -1.79, 95% CI -3.63 to 0.04; moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 66.7%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Range 1 to 18 months (maximum time-point per study), University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries), Study design: randomized controlled trials
In randomized trials, clear aligners probably reduce plaque accumulation versus fixed appliances, though the subgroup estimate is imprecise and its CI crosses no effect (SMD -1.79, 95% CI -3.63 to 0.04; moderate certainty).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -1.79 [-3.63, 0.04]3 studies · 111 participantsModerate
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 6 months, University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries), Follow-up: 6 months
At 6 months, clear aligners were associated with significantly less plaque accumulation than fixed appliances (SMD -2.04, 95% CI -3.37 to -0.70; ungraded).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -2.04 [-3.37, -0.70]5 studies · 253 participantsGRADE not reported
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Range 1 to 12 months (maximum time-point per study), University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries), Study design: non-randomized studies of interventions
In non-randomized studies, clear aligners probably reduce plaque accumulation versus fixed appliances (SMD -1.46, 95% CI -2.77 to -0.15; moderate certainty).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -1.46 [-2.77, -0.15]5 studies · 246 participantsModerate
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 3 months, University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries), Follow-up: 3 months
At 3 months, clear aligners were associated with significantly less plaque accumulation than fixed appliances (SMD -1.08, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.24; ungraded).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -1.08 [-1.93, -0.24]5 studies · 211 participantsGRADE not reported
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Maximum reported time-point per study (range 1-18 months), University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries)
Clear aligners are associated with significantly less plaque accumulation than conventional fixed appliances (pooled SMD -1.58, 95% CI -2.57 to -0.58); certainty graded moderate within study-design subgroups.
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -1.58 [-2.57, -0.58]8 studies · 357 participantsGRADE not reported
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 12 months, University/hospital orthodontic clinics and private practice (multiple countries), Follow-up: 12 months
At 12 months, clear aligners were associated with significantly less plaque accumulation than fixed appliances (SMD -2.14, 95% CI -3.64 to -0.64; ungraded).
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023) All outcomes
SMD -2.14 [-3.64, -0.64]3 studies · 113 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared to fixed orthodontic treatment.…
2023 All outcomes
May 2023 (searched January 2022 to May 2023; literature 1990-May 2023)14Critically Low / Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.