Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42160814

Efficacy of White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures and Apexification for Immature Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Li Zizhan, Xu Yue, An Songlin, et al. · International dental journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2026.109611

Findings

Population Children and adolescents with non-vital immature permanent teeth

8 findings

WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures, single-armNone (single-arm pooled proportion)Radiographic success
PRF + WMTA (REP)
Proportion 0.98 [0.88, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 32 participants
WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic proceduresNone (single-arm proportion)Radiographic success
Generalized linear mixed model, random effects
Proportion 0.96 [0.90, 0.99]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
6 studies · 112 participants
WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures, single-armNone (single-arm pooled proportion)Radiographic success
Overall (random effects, Freeman-Tukey double arcsine)
Proportion 0.99 [0.96, 1.00]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
6 studies · 112 participants
Platelet concentrate scaffold (PRP, PRF or PP) with WMTA in regenerative endodontic proceduresBlood clot scaffold with WMTARadiographic success
PRP + WMTA versus BC + WMTA
OR 7.49 [1.16, 48.22]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 69 participants
Platelet concentrate scaffold (PRP, PRF or PP) with WMTA in regenerative endodontic proceduresBlood clot scaffold with WMTARadiographic success
Overall platelet concentrates (PRP, PRF, PP)
OR 3.56 [0.87, 14.52]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
4 studies · 145 participants
WMTA coronal barrier with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) scaffold in REPNone (single-arm proportion)Radiographic success
Subgroup PRP+MTA, random effects
Proportion 0.98 [0.87, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 33 participants
WMTA coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic proceduresAlternative bioceramic cements (Totalfill putty, Biodentine)Clinical success
Overall (random effects)
OR 0.18 [0.02, 1.68]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
2 studies · 67 participants
WMTA as coronal barrier in REPAlternative bioceramic cements (Totalfill putty, Biodentine) as coronal barrier in REPClinical success
Common effect model
OR 0.18 [0.02, 1.68]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
2 studies · 67 participants

Included primary studies 15

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Ulusoy 2019
Evaluation of Blood Clot, Platelet-rich Plasma, Platelet-rich Fibrin, and Platelet Pellet as Scaffolds in Regenerative Endodontic…
PMID:30935618
20191 other reviewRadiographic success; Clinical success; PM42160814-P4-O1; PM42160814-P5-O1not extracted yet
Alagl 2017
Use of platelet-rich plasma for regeneration in non-vital immature permanent teeth: Clinical and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.
PMID:28415948
2017this review onlyRadiographic success; PM42160814-P4-O1; PM42160814-P5-O1not extracted yet
Alsofi 2019
Regenerative Endodontics for Upper Permanent Central Incisors after Traumatic Injury: Case Report with a 3-year Follow-up.
PMID:31797857
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Aly 2019
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in revascularization of non-vital immature permanent…
PMID:30702789
2019this review onlyClinical successnot extracted yet
Annamalai 2010
Efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate as an apical plug in non-vital young permanent teeth: preliminary results.
PMID:21417116
2010this review onlyRadiographic successnot extracted yet
Bartaw 2024
Discoloration after revascularization using calcium phosphosilicate-based bioceramic versus mineral trioxide aggregate in necrotic…
PMID:38634024
2024this review onlyClinical successnot extracted yet
D'Mello 2017
Management of coronal discolouration following a regenerative endodontic procedure in a maxillary incisor.
PMID:27554379
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ghorbanzadeh 2015
Maturogenesis of Two Maxillary Central Incisors: A Case Report with 10 Years of Follow Up.
PMID:26622286
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kahler 2014
Revascularization outcomes: a prospective analysis of 16 consecutive cases.
PMID:24565648
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kandemir Demirci 2020
Regenerative Endodontic Therapy with Platelet Rich Fibrin: Case Series.
PMID:31995420
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Loroño 2022
Regenerative Endodontic Procedure in an Immature Permanent Incisor with Internal Root Resorption: a Case Report.
PMID:35783498
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maniglia-Ferreira 2020
12-Year Follow-Up of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment of Immature Permanent Upper Incisors with Acute Abscess.
PMID:33237241
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nageh 2018
Assessment of Regaining Pulp Sensibility in Mature Necrotic Teeth Using a Modified Revascularization Technique with Platelet-rich Fibrin:…
PMID:30174103
2018this review onlyRadiographic success; Clinical successnot extracted yet
Sachdeva 2015
Regenerative endodontic treatment of an immature tooth with a necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and…
PMID:25369448
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Timmerman 2018
Bleaching of a Discolored Tooth with Retrieval of Remnants after Successful Regenerative Endodontics.
PMID:29079055
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adolescents with non-vital immature permanent teeth (open apex, pulp necrosis with or without apical periodontitis)Children and adolescents with non-vital immature permanent teeth (15 studies)
InterventionWMTA as apical plug in conventional apexification or as coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures (REP)WMTA as coronal barrier in REP with PRP, PRF, PP or blood clot scaffolds (n=6 studies meta-analyzed); WMTA apical plug in apexification (n=1)
ComparisonBlood clot scaffold; platelet concentrates (PRP, PRF, PP); alternative bioceramics (Biodentine, Totalfill) when directly compared with WMTA; no comparator in single-arm studiesBlood clot scaffold (4 studies, 145 observations); alternative bioceramics Totalfill and Biodentine (2 studies, 67 observations); none in single-arm analysis
OutcomesClinical success; radiographic success; continued root development; restoration of pulp sensibility; tooth discolourationRadiographic success (6 studies, 112 observations); clinical success vs alternative bioceramics (2 studies); root development, pulp sensibility, discolouration narrative
Study designsRCTs, non-RCTs, prospective/retrospective cohorts, case series (3 or more cases) and case reports4 RCTs, 2 cohort studies, 9 case reports/series
TimingNot specifiedFollow-up 3 to 49 months in comparative studies; up to 12 years in case reports

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateNoNoyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesPartial Yes · Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoNono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes