Primary study · included by 1 review
Use of platelet-rich plasma for regeneration in non-vital immature permanent teeth: Clinical and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.
Alagl 2017 · Alagl Adel, Bedi Sumit, Hassan Khalid, et al. · The Journal of international medical research · 2017
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Radiographic success Platelet concentrate scaffold (PRP, PRF or PP) with WMTA in regenerative endodontic procedures vs Blood clot scaffold with WMTA | OR 7.49 [1.16, 48.22] | 2 studies · 69 participants | GRADE not reported |
Radiographic success WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures, single-arm vs None (single-arm pooled proportion) | Proportion 0.98 [0.88, 1.00] | 2 studies · 32 participants | GRADE not reported |
Radiographic success WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures, single-arm vs None (single-arm pooled proportion) | Proportion 0.99 [0.96, 1.00] | 6 studies · 112 participants | Very low |
Radiographic success WMTA as apical plug (apexification) or coronal barrier in regenerative endodontic procedures vs None (single-arm proportion) | Proportion 0.96 [0.90, 0.99] | 6 studies · 112 participants | Very low |
Radiographic success Platelet concentrate scaffold (PRP, PRF or PP) with WMTA in regenerative endodontic procedures vs Blood clot scaffold with WMTA | OR 3.56 [0.87, 14.52] | 4 studies · 145 participants | Very low |
Radiographic success WMTA coronal barrier with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) scaffold in REP vs None (single-arm proportion) | Proportion 0.98 [0.87, 1.00] | 2 studies · 33 participants | GRADE not reported |
Also linked to PM42160814-P4-O1, PM42160814-P5-O1, which does not match a current question in this review.
1 including review in total.