Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42144881

Functional Outcomes of Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Molinero-Mourelle Pedro, Bell Azize, Chebib Najla, et al. · Gerodontology · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/ger.70078

Findings

Population Older adults aged 65 years or older with tooth loss wearing dental prostheses for at least 6 months

10 findings

Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)Objective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better)
6-12 months follow-up
SMD -0.033 [-0.824, 0.759]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better)
6-12 months follow-up
SMD -1.007 [-1.358, -0.656]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)Objective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better)
>12 months follow-up
SMD -0.601 [-0.945, -0.256]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10)
>12 months follow-up
SMD 1.124 [0.719, 1.529]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)OHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better)
>12 months follow-up
SMD -2.612 [-6.250, 1.026]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)No comparison (pooled follow-up mean)Subjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm)
6-12 months follow-up
MEAN 90.571 [75.304, 105.838]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10)
6-12 months follow-up
SMD 0.668 [0.142, 1.193]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)OHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better)
6-12 months follow-up
SMD -2.550 [-4.637, -0.463]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Non-implant-supported prostheses (conventional or digital complete dentures, partial dentures)Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change)OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better)
6-12 months follow-up
SMD -0.948 [-2.007, 0.111]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Non-implant-supported prostheses (conventional or digital complete dentures, partial dentures)No comparison (pooled follow-up mean)Subjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm)
6-12 months follow-up
MEAN 76.700 [64.558, 88.842]
GRADE not reported
3 studies

Included primary studies 24

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Muller 2013
Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:24158342
20133 other reviewsObjective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better); Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10); Subjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm); OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better); PM42144881-P1-O8not extracted yet
Ayna 2018
A comparative study on 7-year results of "All-on-Four™" immediate-function concept for completely edentulous mandibles: metal-ceramic vs.…
PMID:28321585
20181 other reviewOHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better); PM42144881-P1-O6; PM42144881-P1-O7not extracted yet
Carletti 2019
Prostheses satisfaction and diet of elderly wearing a single implant overdenture: A six-month assessment.
PMID:31368121
20191 other reviewSubjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm); OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better)not extracted yet
Casucci 2025
Digital vs. conventional removable complete dentures: A retrospective study on clinical effectiveness and cost-efficiency in edentulous…
PMID:39645185
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Berretin-Felix 2008
A longitudinal study of quality of life of elderly with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses.
PMID:18565012
2008this review onlyOHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better); PM42144881-P1-O6; PM42144881-P1-O7not extracted yet
Bressan 2012
Implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-sectional study.
PMID:21631597
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Brigido 2025
Influence of prosthodontic rehabilitation and dietary advice on glycaemic control, nutritional status and oral health-related quality of…
PMID:38995836
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dable 2013
Assessment of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Among Completely Edentulous Patients in Western India by Using GOHAI.
PMID:24179944
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Emami 2010
Better oral health related quality of life: type of prosthesis or psychological robustness?
PMID:19931345
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Enkling 2019
A prospective cohort study on survival and success of one-piece mini-implants with associated changes in oral function: Five-year outcomes.
PMID:31021481
2019this review onlyObjective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better); Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10); Subjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm); OHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better)not extracted yet
Geckili 2011
Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of elderly Turkish edentulous patients.
PMID:21183231
2011this review onlyOHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better); PM42144881-P1-O6not extracted yet
Goncalves 2024
Four-year assessment of masticatory function in mandibular overdenture wearers: A randomised clinical trial comparing two to four implants…
PMID:38873742
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Heydecke 2003
Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures.
PMID:12752541
2003this review onlyOHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better); PM42144881-P1-O8not extracted yet
Heydecke 2004
Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life -- do coping styles matter?
PMID:15239781
2004this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Iwaki 2024
Effect of digital complete dentures manufactured using the custom disk method on masticatory function.
PMID:38192789
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kawai 2017
A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete…
PMID:27474364
2017this review onlySubjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm)not extracted yet
Maniewicz 2019
Effect of implant-supported mandibular overdentures versus reline on masticatory performance and salivary flow rates in very old adults-A…
PMID:30500094
2019this review onlyObjective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better); Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10); OHRQoL (OHIP-14; lower is better)not extracted yet
Martin-Ares 2016
Prosthetic hygiene and functional efficacy in completely edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life during a 5-year follow-up.
PMID:25893901
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Policastro 2020
Influence of the height of the mandibular ridge on the masticatory function during the functional adaptation with new complete dentures.
PMID:33111881
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schuster 2020
Immediate vs conventional loading of Facility-Equator system in mandibular overdenture wearers: 1-year RCT with clinical, biological, and…
PMID:32363765
2020this review onlyOHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better)not extracted yet
Singla 2025
Impact of Soft Liners on Bite Force in Complete Denture Wearers: A Prospective Cohort Study.
PMID:40013230
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Suzuki 2019
Influence of simplified dietary advice combined with new complete denture fabrication on masticatory function of complete denture wearers.
PMID:31228219
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thomason 2003
Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
PMID:14651229
2003this review onlySubjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm); OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better)not extracted yet
Zhang 2019
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and maintenance events in 2-implant-supported mandibular overdenture patients: A 5-year…
PMID:30714227
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationOlder adults (mean age 65 years or above) with partial or complete tooth loss wearing any type of dental prosthesis for at least 6 monthsOlder adults with mean ages 65.8 to 85.0 years, mostly edentulous (n=24 studies)
InterventionProsthodontic treatment: removable partial or complete conventional dentures, fixed and removable implant prostheses, digitally manufactured denturesComplete dentures, implant overdentures, fixed full-arch implant prostheses, removable partial dentures, digital dentures
ComparisonNo predefined comparator (comparison groups considered for subgroup analysis)Baseline (within-group pre-post change); some studies compared complete dentures with implant overdentures
OutcomesMasticatory performance, masticatory ability, maximum bite force, swallowing and speech, OHRQoL, denture satisfaction, comfortMasticatory performance (SDHue), maximum bite force, subjective masticatory ability (VAS), OHIP-14, OHIP-20, OHIP-EDENT, OIDP, GOHAI, satisfaction and comfort
Study designsRCTs, non-randomized controlled trials, case series, cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies9 RCTs, 1 non-randomized trial, 6 cohort studies, 4 cross-sectional studies, 6 case series; 12 studies in meta-analysis
TimingFollow-up of at least 6 months; short term 6-12 months, long term more than 12 months6-12 months and more than 12 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateNoNoyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesYesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: No · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNoNoyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes