Primary study · included by 4 reviews

Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Müller 2013 · Müller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, et al. · Journal of dental research · 2013

Included by

The Impact of Nutritional Status on Oral Health Outcomes and Management in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Müller 2013 · Reference list 86; Tables 2-4

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Nutritional Outcomes of Overdentures vs. Complete Dentures in Older Edentulous Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Muller 2013 · Table 1; References 6, 13-20

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Functional Outcomes of Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Muller 2013 · Tables 1-2; reference list; forest plot

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · >12 months follow-up	SMD 1.124 [0.719, 1.529]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Objective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · 6-12 months follow-up	SMD -0.033 [-0.824, 0.759]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · 6-12 months follow-up	SMD -1.007 [-1.358, -0.656]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
OHRQoL (OHIP-20; lower is better) Non-implant-supported prostheses (conventional or digital complete dentures, partial dentures) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · 6-12 months follow-up	SMD -0.948 [-2.007, 0.111]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Objective masticatory performance (colour-mixing gum, SDHue; lower is better) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · >12 months follow-up	SMD -0.601 [-0.945, -0.256]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Subjective masticatory ability (VAS 0-100 mm) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs No comparison (pooled follow-up mean) · 6-12 months follow-up	MEAN 90.571 [75.304, 105.838]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Maximum bite force (Occlusal Force-Meter GM10) Implant-supported prostheses (implant overdentures and fixed full-arch implant prostheses) vs Pre-treatment baseline (within-group change) · 6-12 months follow-up	SMD 0.668 [0.142, 1.193]	2 studies	GRADE not reported

Also linked to PM42144881-P1-O8, which does not match a current question in this review.

Implant-Supported and Conventional Dentures: A Meta-Analysis in Older Adults.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Muller 2013 · Table 1; References 16 to 24 and 31 to 42

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

4 including reviews in total.