Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM41820934

Extraction of first primary molars and significance of space loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

El-Motayam Ahmed Kamal, Hassan Mostafa A, Sadek Mais Medhat, et al. · BMC oral health · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-07934-2

Findings

Population Children aged 4-9 years requiring extraction of a first primary molar (Ds)

12 findings

Extraction of a maxillary first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
9-12 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Park 2009
MD -0.6 [-0.91, -0.3]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
9-12 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Alexander 2015
MD -0.52 [-0.97, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
9-12 months
MD -0.52 [-0.79, -0.26]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 141 participants
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
9-12 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Lin 2011
MD -0.5 [-0.77, -0.23]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
9-12 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Kundra 2024
MD -0.48 [-0.75, -0.21]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Alexander 2015
MD -1.78 [-2.09, -1.47]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Kundra 2024
MD -1.45 [-1.97, -0.93]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · After excluding Alexander 2015, fixed-effect model (final estimate)
MD -1.78 [-2.09, -1.47]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 171 participants
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Lin and Chang 1998
MD -1.57 [-2.12, -1.02]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Initial analysis, fixed-effect model (4 studies)
MD -1.51 [-1.74, -1.28]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Leave-one-out sensitivity: omitting Padma and Retnakumari 2006
MD -1.22 [-1.55, -0.9]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molarContralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control)Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
8-9 months · Initial analysis, random-effects model (4 studies)
MD -1.52 [-1.99, -1.04]
GRADE not reported
4 studies

Included primary studies 7

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Alexander 2015
The premature loss of primary first molars: space loss to molar occlusal relationships and facial patterns.
PMID:25010923
2015this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet
Kobylinska 2019
Spatial changes in the dental arch after premature extraction of the first primary molar – a 12-month observational study
DOI:10.25121/newmed.2019.23.3.96
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kundra 2024
Spatial and angular alterations in the dental arch after premature loss of primary molars: Immediate and 9-month computed tomography…
PMID:39250207
2024this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet
Lin 2011
Twelve-month space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar.
PMID:20961344
2011this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet
Lin and Chang 1998
Space changes after premature loss of the mandibular primary first molar: a longitudinal study.
PMID:9796501
1998this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet
Padma and Retnakumari 2006
Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: a longitudinal study.
PMID:16823234
2006this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet
Park 2009
Three-dimensional space changes after premature loss of a maxillary primary first molar.
PMID:19486367
2009this review onlySpace loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control sidenot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren aged 4-9 yearsChildren aged 5-9 years; 141 children in maxillary and 171 in mandibular analyses
InterventionExtraction of a first primary molar (exposure)Extraction of upper or lower primary first molar (n=7 studies)
ComparisonContralateral non-extraction side in the same patient (split-mouth)Contralateral control side (n=7 studies)
OutcomesChange in the primary first molar space (D or D+E space) in millimetersSpace loss (D or D+E space) in mm; maxillary (4 studies in meta-analysis) and mandibular (3 to 4 studies)
Study designsProspective or retrospective cohort studies (split-mouth)Prospective cohort studies with split-mouth design (n=7)
TimingFollow-up of at least 6 monthsFollow-up 8 to 12 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsNRYesno
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNRPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNRYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNRPartial Yesno
5Study selection in duplicateNRYesno
6Data extraction in duplicateNRYesno
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNRYesno
8Included studies described in detailNRPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNRNono
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNRNono
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNRYesno
14Heterogeneity explainedNRYesno
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNRYesno
16Conflicts of interest reportedNRYesno
OverallNRModerateno