Primary study · included by 1 review

Three-dimensional space changes after premature loss of a maxillary primary first molar.

Park 2009 · Park Kitae, Jung Da-Woon, Kim Ji-Yeon · International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2009

Included by

Extraction of first primary molars and significance of space loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Park 2009 · Table 1; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.6 [-0.91, -0.3]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.52 [-0.97, -0.08]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.52 [-0.79, -0.26]4 studies · 141 participantsGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.5 [-0.77, -0.23]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.48 [-0.75, -0.21]3 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.