Primary study · included by 1 review

Spatial and angular alterations in the dental arch after premature loss of primary molars: Immediate and 9-month computed tomography evaluation.

Kundra 2024 · Kundra Ruchika, Sharma Deepak, Kaur Ravneet, et al. · Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry · 2024

Included by

Extraction of first primary molars and significance of space loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Kundra 2024 · Table 1; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.78 [-2.09, -1.47]3 studies · 171 participantsGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.6 [-0.91, -0.3]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.78 [-2.09, -1.47]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.45 [-1.97, -0.93]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.52 [-0.97, -0.08]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.57 [-2.12, -1.02]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.51 [-1.74, -1.28]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.52 [-0.79, -0.26]4 studies · 141 participantsGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.22 [-1.55, -0.9]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.5 [-0.77, -0.23]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a mandibular first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 8-9 months
MD -1.52 [-1.99, -1.04]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Space loss (D or D+E space, mm), extraction side minus control side
Extraction of a maxillary first primary molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side in the same child (split-mouth control) · 9-12 months
MD -0.48 [-0.75, -0.21]3 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.