Cochrane · intervention · CD012018

Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental caries

Worthington, HV, MacDonald, L, Poklepovic Pericic, T, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthDental cariesPeriodontology2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
60
current version
GRADE rated
29
No studies
18
Included studies
35
as reported
No studies 18 · 30%Ungraded 13 · 21.7%Very low 20 · 33.3%Low 9 · 15%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationDentate participants irrespective of age, race, sex, socioeconomic status, geographical location, background fluoride exposure, initial dental health status, setting or time of intervention. Excluded: majority with orthodontic appliances; participants selected on the basis of special health conditions; or majority with severe periodontal disease35 RCTs randomising 3929 adults (aged 18-78 years; mean ages 20-53 years); most studies included both sexes; most participants had slight to moderate periodontal disease (advanced disease excluded) and a low level of gingival inflammation at baseline; no studies in children
InterventionToothbrushing plus any home-use mechanical interdental cleaning device (floss; interdental brushes; wooden cleaning sticks; rubber/elastomeric cleaning sticks; oral irrigators)Floss (n=15); Interdental brushes (n=2); Wooden cleaning sticks (n=2); Rubber/elastomeric cleaning sticks (n=2); Oral irrigators (n=5)
ComparisonToothbrushing alone; Another mechanical interdental cleaning deviceToothbrushing alone (n=35); Flossing (comparator in head-to-head comparisons)
OutcomesPrimary: Gingivitis (gingival and bleeding indices); Periodontitis (clinical attachment loss, pocket probing depth); Interproximal caries (progression into enamel/dentine, D(M)FS change, radiographic); Plaque (scores/indices); Harms and adverse effects. Secondary: Halitosis; Patient satisfaction; Cost of interventionGingivitis (n=35); Plaque (n=33); Periodontitis (n=6, useable data in 1 comparison); Interproximal caries (n=0); Adverse effects (n=22); Halitosis (n=0); Patient satisfaction (n=0); Cost of intervention (n=0)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (including split-mouth, cross-over and cluster-randomised); minimum duration 4 weeksParallel-group, split-mouth and cross-over randomised controlled trials (first-period data only used from cross-over trials)
TimingMinimum intervention duration 4 weeks for periodontal diseases and 24 weeks for dental cariesOutcomes measured at 1 month (short term) and 3 and 6 months (medium term); most measured at 4-6 weeks

Search date: 2019-01-16. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; CINAHL EBSCO

Questions and results

Current version only

Flossing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.03 [-0.14, 0.08]2 studies · 158 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Harms and adverse effects
Adverse effects were assessed and reported in seven studies. Three reported no adverse events on the oral hard or soft tissues. Four reported sporadic adverse events with mild severity, with no evidence of a difference…7 studiesUngraded
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (gingival index)
1 month
SMD -0.58 [-1.12, -0.04]8 studies · 585 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Plaque
1 month
SMD -0.42 [-0.85, 0.02]7 studies · 542 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
One study measured probing pocket depth but no data were reported (Graziani 2017).1 studyUngraded

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
1 month
SMD -1.07 [-1.51, -0.63]2 studies · 93 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
One study measured probing pocket depth but no data were reported (Graziani 2017).1 studyUngraded
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (gingival index)
1 month
MD -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23]1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.05 [-0.13, 0.03]1 study · 31 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Harms and adverse effects
Harms and adverse outcomes (SoF): Neither study reported any information about adverse events. Jared 2005 assessed adverse events (participants issued a symptom diary) but did not report the findings; Graziani 2017 did…1 studyUngraded

Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
3 months
MD -0.03 [-0.13, 0.07]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (gingival index)
Gingivitis measured by gingival index: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
3 months
MD -0.25 [-0.37, -0.13]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Harms and adverse effects
Harms and adverse outcomes: Not reported (neither study reported on adverse effects).0 studiesNo studies
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
No included study assessed periodontitis as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
One study measured probing pocket depth but no data were reported (Graziani 2017 mentioned PPD as outcome but no data).1 studyUngraded
Harms and adverse effects
Harms and adverse outcomes: Not reported (neither study reported on adverse effects).0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.07 [-0.15, 0.01]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Plaque
1 month
MD -0.22 [-0.41, -0.03]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (gingival index)
1 month
MD -0.01 [-0.19, 0.21]1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
Periodontitis measured in one study but useable data not provided (Walsh 1989 reported proportion of sites with >4 mm pocket depth at 3 months but not mean PD; attachment loss measured but no data).1 studyUngraded
Plaque
1 month
SMD -0.16 [-0.41, 0.10]3 studies · 235 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Gingivitis (gingival index)
1 month
SMD -0.48 [-0.89, -0.06]4 studies · 380 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.00 [-0.07, 0.06]2 studies · 126 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Harms and adverse effects
Three studies reported that there were no adverse events, one reported one incidence of aphthous ulcer in irrigator group, one reported oral lacerations but found no difference between the interventions, and one did…5 studiesUngraded
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
4 to 6 weeks
MD -0.06 [-0.08, -0.03]6 studies · 234 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Gingivitis (gingival index)
4 to 6 weeks
SMD -0.40 [-0.70, -0.11]3 studies · 183 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Plaque
1 month (4 to 6 weeks)
SMD -0.47 [-0.84, -0.11]5 studies · 290 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
4 to 6 weeks
MD -0.06 [-0.27, 0.16]3 studies · 107 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Harms and adverse effects
Five studies reported there were no adverse events. Two studies reported on problems with the use of interdental brushes or floss, which sometimes caused soreness. (Six studies reported on adverse events; none…6 studiesUngraded

Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis (gingival index)
Gingivitis measured by gingival index: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
No included study assessed periodontitis.0 studiesNo studies
Plaque
3 months
MD 0.02 [-0.06, 0.10]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Harms and adverse effects
Harms and adverse outcomes: Not reported (neither study reported on adverse effects).0 studiesNo studies
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
3 months
MD 0.01 [-0.12, 0.14]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis (gingival index)
4 to 6 weeks
SMD -0.22 [-0.69, 0.24]6 studies · 256 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Plaque
4 to 6 weeks
SMD -0.08 [-0.46, 0.29]6 studies · 273 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
One study measured periodontitis but the data were not usable (Smith 1988 measured PPD but data unusable).1 studyUngraded
Harms and adverse effects
Five studies assessed adverse events. One did not report findings, but the others reported either no adverse events or minor adverse events that did not significantly differ between interventions.5 studiesUngraded
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.03 [-0.08, 0.03]5 studies · 212 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.12 [-0.19, -0.05]2 studies · 133 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
No included study assessed periodontitis.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis (gingival index)
1 month
MD -0.06 [-0.12, 0.00]1 study · 63 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Plaque
1 month
SMD 0.31 [-0.08, 0.70]2 studies · 133 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Harms and adverse effects
Both studies reported that there were no adverse events in either study group.2 studiesUngraded

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing

Population: Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
CD012018.PUB2 (current) · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
4 to 6 weeks
SMD 0.08 [-0.33, 0.49]2 studies · 92 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Gingivitis (gingival index)
4 to 6 weeks
MD 0.10 [-0.32, 0.52]1 study · 61 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites)
1 month
MD -0.02 [-0.10, 0.06]1 study · 31 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Interproximal caries
No included study assessed caries as an outcome.0 studiesNo studies
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)
Two studies measured periodontitis but data not presented or usable (Smith 1988 PPD unusable; Graziani 2017 measured PPD but no data).2 studiesUngraded
Harms and adverse effects
Harms and adverse outcomes (SoF): Not reported. Yost 2006 performed examinations of the oral soft tissue at the final visit but did not report the findings; Graziani 2017 and Smith 1988 did not measure adverse effects.1 studyUngraded

Flossing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Rubber/elastomeric cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing

Population: Dentate participants (any age)
CD012018 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
no estimate extractedNRNo studies