Cochrane · intervention · CD006386

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

Parmar, A, Macluskey, M, Mc Goldrick, N, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
2
Included studies
100
as reported
No studies 2 · 11.1%Ungraded 9 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 16.7%Moderate 4 · 22.2%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and neck cancer trials included where >50% of participants have oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer or separate data availableOral cavity and oropharyngeal (and mixed head and neck, >50% oral/oropharyngeal) squamous cell carcinoma (n=100 trials; 18,813 participants)
InterventionChemotherapy (cytotoxic/antineoplastic drugs) by any mode of administration, as induction, concomitant or adjuvant treatment, +/- radiotherapy and/or surgeryInduction chemotherapy plus LRT (n=36); surgery + adjuvant treatment (n=varies); concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n=varies); head-to-head chemotherapy regimens (n=varies)
ComparisonOther chemotherapy / different regimen, timing or mode of administration; surgical combinations; radiotherapy combinations; no chemotherapyLocoregional treatment alone (radiotherapy and/or surgery); observation/no chemotherapy; alternative chemotherapy regimen
OutcomesPrimary: Overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary: Disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death); Locoregional control (response to primary treatment)Overall survival; Disease-free survival; Locoregional control
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (minimum 6 months follow-up in PUB2 onwards)Randomised controlled trials (RCT)
TimingNot specifiedFollow-up 3-8 years

Search date: 2021-09. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE (OVID); Embase (OVID); US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov); WHO ICTRP

Questions and results

Show all 4 versions

Induction chemotherapy plus locoregional treatment (radiotherapy and/or surgery) vs Locoregional treatment (radiotherapy and/or surgery) alone

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival, induction platinum + 5-fluorouracil prior to surgery vs surgery alone
HR 1.06 [0.71, 1.60]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 211; 520; 721 per 1000
1 study · 198 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Disease-free survival, induction platinum + 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone
HR 0.78 [0.63, 0.97]3 studies · 332 participantsUngraded
Overall survival, induction cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + docetaxel prior to concurrent chemoradiation (cisplatin) vs concurrent chemoradiation (cisplatin)
HR 1.08 [0.80, 1.44]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 214; 527; 728 per 1000
3 studies · 760 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Locoregional control, induction cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + docetaxel prior to concurrent chemoradiation vs concurrent chemoradiation
RR 0.80 [0.64, 0.99]3 studiesUngraded
Overall survival, induction platinum + 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone
HR 0.85 [0.70, 1.04]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 173; 445; 641 per 1000
5 studies · 7427 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Overall survival, induction cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil prior to concurrent chemoradiation (cisplatin) vs concurrent chemoradiation (cisplatin)
HR 0.71 [0.37, 1.35]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 147; 389; 575 per 1000
2 studies · 389 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Surgery +/- radiotherapy + (adjuvant) chemotherapy vs Surgery +/- radiotherapy alone (observation or adjuvant radiotherapy only)

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival, adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation alone following surgery
HR 0.95 [0.73, 1.22]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 191; 482; 681 per 1000
5 studies · 353 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Disease-free survival, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation vs adjuvant radiotherapy (pooled)
HR 0.84 [0.72, 0.97]4 studiesUngraded
Overall survival, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation vs adjuvant radiotherapy
HR 0.84 [0.72, 0.98]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 171; 441; 636 per 1000
4 studies · 1097 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency

Concomitant (concurrent) chemoradiotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone (non-resectable tumours)

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Locoregional control, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (platinum + 5-fluorouracil) vs radiotherapy alone (pooled)
RR 0.75 [0.61, 0.93]3 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival, concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone (pooled)
HR 0.74 [0.67, 0.80]13 studiesUngraded
Overall survival, concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone (pooled)
HR 0.74 [0.67, 0.83]
200; 500; 700 per 1000 (low; medium; high risk population) vs 156; 410; 599 per 1000
24 studies · 2852 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency

Chemotherapy regimen A (+/- locoregional treatment) vs Chemotherapy regimen B (+/- locoregional treatment)

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival, chemotherapy regimen A vs regimen B
Eight of 11 induction-before-radiotherapy studies reported overall survival; not pooled (heterogeneity). Only Vermorken 2007 significant: cisplatin+5-FU+docetaxel induction HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.93, P = 0.01).…8 studiesUngraded
Disease-free survival, chemotherapy regimen A vs regimen B
Induction cisplatin+5-FU+docetaxel vs cisplatin+5-FU: disease-free survival HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.91, P = 0.006; Vermorken 2007). Prior to concurrent chemoradiation: Posner 2007 HR 0.71 (0.56 to 0.90, P = 0.005).…2 studiesUngraded
Locoregional control, chemotherapy regimen A vs regimen B
Locoregional control reported in 12 studies; not pooled. Olasz 2000 RR 0.50 (0.26 to 0.96); Prevost 2005 RR 1.48 (1.04 to 2.11); Molinari 1982 RR 0.35 (0.19 to 0.66).12 studiesUngraded

Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Quality of life
Quality of life was a planned (protocol) outcome but no included trial provided usable quality-of-life data; the protocol was modified to report only survival/response outcomes.0 studiesNo studies
Toxicity / adverse effects (harms) of chemotherapy
Harms/toxicity were planned but very little quantitative data suitable for analysis were found; toxicity reported narratively and not quantified or GRADE-rated.NRUngraded

Chemotherapy vs Placebo

Population: People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Types of studies: it was anticipated that there would be no studies comparing chemotherapy with placebo (none were identified).0 studiesNo studies