Cochrane · intervention · CD005293

Interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury

Coulthard, P, Kushnerev, E, Yates, JM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthOral and maxillofacial surgery2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
12
Included studies
2
as reported
No studies 12 · 75%Ungraded 2 · 12.5%Very low 2 · 12.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve31 participants randomised across two trials, 26 analysed; adults aged 17 to 55 years with partial altered sensation due to inferior alveolar nerve injury after oral surgery (n=26)
InterventionSurgical (exploration and external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy, neuroma excision, tubulization, grafting, laser); Medical (systemic: analgesics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, steroids; topical: analgesics, anaesthetics); Psychological (counselling, acupuncture, cognitive behavioural therapy, relaxation therapy, behaviour modification, electromyographic biofeedback, hypnosis, re-education)Low-level laser therapy (photon-plus GaAlAs diode laser; 70 mW, 820 nm) (n=26)
ComparisonA different active intervention (direct comparison), or no treatment; also the same intervention delivered at different time pointsPlacebo (sham) laser therapy (n=26)
OutcomesPrimary: pain; patient-reported altered sensation (spontaneous or evoked: anaesthesia/paraesthesia/dysaesthesia/hyperalgesia/allodynia); difficulty eating; difficulty speaking; taste. Secondary: quality of life/patient satisfaction; adverse events; mechanosensory (pin prick/two-point/light touch/pressure/pain/thermal thresholds); thermosensory; somatosensory evoked potentialsPatient-reported altered sensation, VAS change at chin and lip (n=13); mechanosensory perception (n=26); thermosensory perception (n=25)
Study designsAll randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions for the treatment of iatrogenic inferior alveolar or lingual nerve injuryTwo two-arm parallel-group RCTs (Khullar 1996a, Norway; Khullar 1996b, Sweden), both at high risk of bias (n=2)
TimingOutcomes categorised by timing closest to < 3 months, ≤ 6 months, > 6 months post-operativeNot reported

Search date: 2013-10. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trial Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE via OVID; EMBASE via OVID; ClinicalTrials.gov; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Low-level laser therapy (photon-plus GaAlAs diode laser; 70 mW output, continuous 820 nm) vs Placebo (sham) laser therapy

Population: Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve
12 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Patient-reported altered sensation (spontaneous or evoked: anaesthesia/paraesthesia/dysaesthesia/hyperalgesia/allodynia)
Lip
MD 21.79 [5.29, 38.29]1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Somatosensory evoked potentials
Results: 'No studies reported on ... somatosensory evoked potentials ...'. Not reported by the included trials.0 studiesNo studies
Patient-reported altered sensation (spontaneous or evoked: anaesthesia/paraesthesia/dysaesthesia/hyperalgesia/allodynia)
Chin
MD 8.40 [3.67, 13.13]
-0.68 cm (mean change in sensation, placebo group; VAS 0 to 10 cm) vs 8.40 cm greater than placebo (mean change in the…
1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Mechanosensory perception (load in grams to elicit sensation; Semmes Weinstein monofilaments)
MD 1.07 [0.17, 1.97]2 studies · 26 participantsUngraded
Difficulty speaking
SoF row 'Difficulty speaking': This outcome was not reported in the included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Difficulty eating
SoF row 'Difficulty eating': This outcome was not reported in the included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Quality of life
Results: 'No studies reported on quality of life ...'. Not reported by the included laser trials.0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events
SoF row 'Adverse events': This outcome was not reported in the included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Pain
SoF row 'Pain': This outcome was not reported in the included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Taste
SoF row 'Taste': This outcome was not reported in the included studies.0 studiesNo studies
Thermosensory (thermal) perception
MD 1.79 [-2.04, 5.62]2 studies · 25 participantsUngraded
Patient satisfaction
Results: no included study reported quality of life or patient satisfaction. In PUB2 patient satisfaction is merged with quality of life as 'quality of life/patient satisfaction'.0 studiesNo studies

Medical interventions (systemic: analgesics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, steroids; topical: analgesics, anaesthetics) vs Another intervention, or no intervention

Population: Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Results: 'No studies evaluated medical ... interventions.' No eligible RCT of medical interventions (analgesics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, steroids, topical anaesthetics).0 studiesNo studies

Psychological / counselling interventions (counselling, acupuncture, cognitive behavioural therapy, relaxation therapy, behaviour modification, electromyographic biofeedback, hypnosis, re-education) vs Another intervention, or no intervention

Population: Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Results: 'No studies evaluated ... psychological interventions.' No eligible RCT of psychological / counselling interventions (CBT, relaxation, behaviour modification, biofeedback, hypnosis, re-education, acupuncture).0 studiesNo studies

One active intervention (surgical, medical, or psychological) vs A different active intervention (direct head-to-head comparison)

Population: Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Discussion: 'There is also a lack of trials directly comparing these methods ...'. No eligible RCT directly comparing different active interventions.0 studiesNo studies

An intervention delivered at one time point vs The same intervention delivered at a different time point

Population: Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
< 3 months; ≤ 6 months; > 6 months
Discussion / Methods: no trials addressed optimal timing; the planned timing subgroup analyses (< 3 months, ≤ 6 months, > 6 months) could not be undertaken.0 studiesNo studies