Cochrane · intervention · CD004968

Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2008 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthPeriodontology2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
8
Included studies
1
as reported
No studies 8 · 66.7%Ungraded 4 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPeople aged at least 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of periodontitisAdults with periodontitis; one RCT (Burgett 1992); 50 patients completed the 2 years of the study
Intervention(1) Occlusal adjustment: reshaping the occlusal surfaces of teeth by grinding to create harmonious contact relationships; (2) Bite planes: an appliance designed to stop the upper and lower teeth contacting each other; (3) Splinting: an appliance designed to immobilize and stabilize mobile teeth; (4) Orthodontic therapy in adults: treatment designed to move the tooth to correct a malposition (each as an adjunct to non-surgical and/or surgical periodontal therapy)Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to periodontal therapy (n=25)
ComparisonNon-surgical and/or surgical periodontal therapy alone; periodontal therapy with a sham (placebo) occlusal intervention; periodontal therapy with a different type of occlusal intervention (head-to-head)Periodontal therapy alone, no occlusal adjustment (n=25)
OutcomesPrimary: tooth loss. Secondary: (1) clinical attachment level change; (2) probing depth change; (3) patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects; (4) adverse effects (thermal sensitivity, over-eruption of treated teeth, TMJ symptoms, poor aesthetics, reduction in oral hygiene standards)Clinical attachment level change (n=50); probing (pocket) depth change (n=50); tooth loss, patient acceptability and adverse effects not reported
Study designsRandomised controlled clinical trials with a follow-up of 3 months or longer1 RCT, parallel-group (Burgett 1992)
TimingFollow-up of 3 months or longer2 years

Search date: 2008-04. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy vs Non-surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)

Population: Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Tooth loss
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Probing (pocket) depth change (difference in mean reduction, mm)
2 years
MD 0.04 [-0.19, 0.27]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects (e.g. thermal sensitivity, over-eruption, TMJ symptoms, poor aesthetics, reduced oral hygiene)
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Clinical attachment level change (mean gain, mm)
2 years
MD 0.38 [0.04, 0.72]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded

Occlusal adjustment as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy vs Surgical periodontal therapy alone (no occlusal adjustment)

Population: Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Tooth loss
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Adverse effects (e.g. thermal sensitivity, over-eruption, TMJ symptoms, poor aesthetics, reduced oral hygiene)
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Clinical attachment level change (mean gain, mm)
2 years
MD 0.40 [0.05, 0.75]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Patient acceptability of treatment and its side effects
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Probing (pocket) depth change (difference in mean reduction, mm)
2 years
MD 0.01 [-0.20, 0.22]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded

Occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy vs Sham (placebo) occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy

Population: Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

One type of occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy vs A different type of occlusal intervention as an adjunct to periodontal therapy (head-to-head)

Population: Adults (aged 18 years or older) with a clinical diagnosis of (chronic) periodontitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
Minimum 3 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies