Intervention not reported
IMPORTANT RECOVERY · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention may leads to higher IMPORTANT RECOVERY (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale from ‐5 to +5 (greater recovery) · patients with low back pain
The intervention may leads to higher global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale from ‐5 to +5 (greater recovery) · patients with low back pain
The intervention showed no clear difference in global impression of recovery Global Perceived Effect Scale: scale… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one week · Patients with acute low‐back pain
It is very uncertain whether spinal manipulative therapy plus another intervention changes recovery at one week compared with the intervention alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at 3 to 6 months · Patients with acute low‐back pain
It is very uncertain whether spinal manipulative therapy plus another intervention changes recovery at 3 to 6 months compared with the intervention alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one week · Patients with acute low‐back pain
Spinal manipulative therapy showed no clear difference in recovery at one week compared with inert interventions (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one month · Patients with acute low‐back pain
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one month · Patients with acute low‐back pain
Spinal manipulative therapy showed no clear difference in recovery at one month compared with other interventions (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one month · adults with chronic low‐back pain
Spinal manipulative therapy probably leads to higher recovery at 1 month compared with all other interventions (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery at one month · adults with chronic low‐back pain
It is very uncertain whether spinal manipulative therapy changes recovery at 1 month compared with inert interventions (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
WORK PARTICIPATION · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention probably leads to higher WORK PARTICIPATION (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
PAIN INTENSITY · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention may leads to higher PAIN INTENSITY (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Perceived recovery · acute non‐specific LBP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Perceived recovery · acute non‐specific LBP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Recovery at one month · patients with chronic LBP
It is very uncertain whether spinal manipulative therapy plus any intervention changes recovery at one month compared with the intervention alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review