Cochrane · systematic review · CD011284
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Hayden, JA, Wilson, MN, Riley, RD, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
Back and NeckAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual recovery expectations (measured dichotomously or continuously, as noted)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
WORK PARTICIPATION | OR 2.43 [1.64, 3.62] | 16 studies · 4324 participants | Moderate |
IMPORTANT RECOVERY | OR 1.89 [1.49, 2.41] | 6 studies · 7265 participants | Low |
FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS | OR 1.4 [0.85, 2.31] | 6 studies · 1397 participants | Very low |
PAIN INTENSITY | OR 1.15 [1.08, 1.23] | 5 studies · 1510 participants | Low |