What do systematic reviews say?

Collaborative care vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Collaborative care vs usual care

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 227 participants
  Very low

Collaborative care vs usual care

Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in mental state: clinically important change (binary) compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.77, 1.28]
  1 study · 253 participants
  Low

Collaborative care vs usual care

Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in psychiatric hospital admissions compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5.15 [0.67, 39.57]
  1 study · 253 participants
  Low

Collaborative care vs usual care

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 237 participants
  Very low

Collaborative care vs usual care

Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in disability (proxy for social functioning) compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.38 [0.97, 1.95]
  1 study · 253 participants
  Low

Collaborative care vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Early warning signs training and treatment as usual vs treatment

• Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 3 participants
  Very low

Early warning signs training and treatment as usual vs treatment

• Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 129 participants
  Very low

Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies
  No studies found

Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 13 participants
  Low

EMDR vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

EMDR vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

EMDR vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

EMDR vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 102 participants
  Low

EMDR vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Low

Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 9 participants
  Low

Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 9 participants
  Very low

Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 48 participants
  Very low