Question · asked by 1 review
Individual TF‐CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist): Depressive symptoms
- Population
- Adults with co‐morbid PTSD and SMI
- Intervention
- Individual TF‐CBT
- Comparison
- inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)
- Outcome
- Depressive symptoms
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Individual TF‐CBT vs waiting list/usual care Depressive symptoms ‐ average endpoint BDI‐II total (high = poor) ‐ medium term (12 months) ‐ skewed data · Adults with co‐morbid PTSD and SMI Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 48 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological interventions for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with severe mental illness 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Individual TF‐CBT vs Brief PTSD psychoeducation · Adults with co‐morbid PTSD and SMI · 1 review
- Individual TF‐CBT vs EMDR · Adults with co‐morbid PTSD and SMI · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.