Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

582 questions · 601 findings · 57 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 93 · 15.5%GRADE not reported 9 · 1.5%Very low 96 · 16%Low 225 · 37.4%Moderate 118 · 19.6%High 60 · 10%

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

All‐cause hospital mortality · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in all‐cause hospital mortality compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.73 [0.37, 1.41]
3 studies · 538 participants
Low

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Time to thrombolytic treatment [minutes] · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 438 participants
High

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Acute myocardial infarction functional outcomes ‐ ejection fraction [percentage] · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 416 participants
Low

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Adverse effects ‐ ventricular Fribrillation · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ ventricular Fribrillation compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.73 [0.68, 10.86]
2 studies · 178 participants
Low

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Adverse effects ‐ bleeding complications · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ bleeding complications compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.88 [0.41, 1.92]
2 studies · 438 participants
Moderate

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Allergic adverse events · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ allergic reaction compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0 [0.19, 77.03]
1 study · 100 participants
Low

Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis

Adverse effects ‐ Stroke · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ Stroke compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.11 [0.39, 11.4]
1 study · 360 participants
Low

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Survival to hospital discharge with good neurological function · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 7587 participants
Moderate

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Survival to hospital discharge · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 8067 participants
Moderate

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Return of spontaneous circulation · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 11771 participants
Low

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Survival to hospital admission · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 7224 participants
Moderate

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Sternal or rib fractures · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 7469 participants
Low

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Haemothorax or pneumothorax · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 7316 participants
Low

Mechanical chest compressions vs manual chest compressions

Internal abdominal organ injury · people suffering cardiac arrest

1 finding from 1 review

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 7337 participants
Low

Mobile phone interventions vs usual care

Objective measure of medication adherence: Blood pressure · people prescribed medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

1 finding from 1 review

Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
13 studies · 25166 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) · adults without prevalent cardiovascular disease (primary cardiovascular disease prevention)

1 finding from 1 review

Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 studies · 32954 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg Median · adults older than 18 years, with no restriction regarding presence of ASCVD; participants generally had elevated risk of ASCVD (as…

1 finding from 1 review

Fixed‐dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
13 studies · 7638 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Systolic blood pressure, change from baseline (mmHg) · people with primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in

1 finding from 1 review

Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 4868 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Diastolic blood pressure, change from baseline (mmHg) · people with primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in

1 finding from 1 review

Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 4701 participants
Low

Mobile phone text messages vs usual care

Medication adherence (continuous) · people with established arterial occlusive events

1 finding from 1 review

Mobile phone text messaging for medication adherence in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
18 studies · 8136 participants
Very low