Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ service‐level monetary incentiveg · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ household + service‐level monetary incentive · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives may leads to higher proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG (SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG… compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3 (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3… compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ measles/MMR (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives may leads to higher proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐… compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all… compared with routine care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost of the intervention · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · children under 5 years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives: addition of monetary incentives changes retention [ compared with addition of a monetary reward (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Non‐monetary incentives: addition of pen showed no clear difference in retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives: addition of monetary reward changes retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Retention [ · trial participants being followed up for data collection
Monetary incentives: addition of monetary incentives may leads to higher retention [ compared with usual follow‐up (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age (phone call/SMS only) · children under 5 years of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review