Question · asked by 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care: Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef

Population
children under 5 years of age
Intervention
Monetary incentives
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Monetary incentives vs routine care
Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef · children under 5 years of age
It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).
Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.93, 1.21]2 studies · 2709 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.