Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

28 questions · 28 findings · 5 reviews · Stroke

No studies found 5 · 17.9%GRADE not reported 3 · 10.7%Very low 1 · 3.6%Low 4 · 14.3%Moderate 8 · 28.6%High 7 · 25%

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death or stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher death or stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Long‐term ipsilateral stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher ipsilateral stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Type of recurrent event · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in type of recurrent event compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment may leads to higher death compared with conventional medical treatment alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Dependency · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in dependency compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs medical treatment

Death or stroke · people with vertebral artery stenosis

Endovascular treat ment plus medical treatment showed no clear difference in 30‐day post‐randomisation death/stroke compared with medical treatment alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs medical treatment

Fatal/non‐fatal stroke in the territory of the treated vertebral artery stenosis(assessed after 30 days post‐randomisation to completion of · people with vertebral artery stenosis

Endovascular treat ment plus medical treatment showed no clear difference in fatal/non‐fatal stroke in the territory of the treated vertebral… compared with medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs medical treatment

Stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic)Median · people with vertebral artery stenosis

Endovascular treat ment plus medical treatment showed no clear difference in stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic)Median compared with medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous thrombolytic treatment vs standard‐of‐care therapy

Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at · people with stroke upon awakening

Intravenous thrombolytic treatment showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at compared with standard medical care (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review