Cochrane · systematic review · CD010995

Intravenous thrombolytic treatment and endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic wake‐up stroke

Roaldsen, MB, Lindekleiv, H, Mathiesen, EB · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Stroke2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 16.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 5 · 83.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Intravenous thrombolytic treatment compared to standard medical care for wake‐up stroke

Population: people with stroke upon awakening
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Independent functional outcome at end of
Intravenous thrombolytic treatment vs standard medical care
RR 1.13 [1.01, 1.26]5 studies · 763 participantsHigh
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at
Intravenous thrombolytic treatment vs standard medical care
RR 3.47 [0.98, 12.26]4 studies · 754 participantsHigh
Death at
Intravenous thrombolytic treatment vs standard medical care
RR 0.68 [0.43, 1.07]5 studies · 763 participantsHigh

Endovascular treatment compared to standard medical care for wake‐up stroke

Population: people with stroke upon awakening
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Independent functional outcome at end of
Endovascular treatment vs standard medical care
RR 5.12 [2.57, 10.17]2 studies · 205 participantsHigh
Intracranial haemorrhage at
Endovascular treatment vs standard medical care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Death at
Endovascular treatment vs standard medical care
RR 0.68 [0.43, 1.07]2 studies · 205 participantsHigh