Griseofulvin vs azole
Griseofulvin showed no clear difference in clinical cure compared with azole (moderate certainty).
- RR 0.94 [0.45, 1.96]5 studies · 222 participantsModerate
Griseofulvin showed no clear difference in clinical cure compared with azole (moderate certainty).
Griseofulvin showed no clear difference in mycological cure compared with azole (moderate certainty).
Griseofulvin probably leads to higher adverse events compared with azole (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether griseofulvin changes recurrence rate compared with azole (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Griseofulvin may leads to lower clinical cure compared with terbinafine (low certainty).
Griseofulvin may leads to lower mycological cure compared with terbinafine (low certainty).
Griseofulvin may leads to higher adverse events compared with terbinafine (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Complete cure and adverse events for terbinafine showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (low certainty).
Complete cure for ketoconazole showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (low certainty).
Complete cure for fluconazole showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (moderate certainty).
Complete cure and adverse events for terbinafine showed no clear difference in adverse events attributed to the study drugs compared with griseofulvin (moderate certainty).
Complete cure and adverse events for terbinafine showed no clear difference in severe adverse events compared with griseofulvin (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether complete cure for itraconazole changes proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (very low certainty).