Question · asked by 1 review

Complete cure for fluconazole vs griseofulvin: Proportion of participants with complete cure

Complete cure for fluconazole showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Complete cure for fluconazole vs griseofulvin
Proportion of participants with complete cure · children with tinea capitis
Complete cure for fluconazole showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (moderate certainty).
Systemic antifungal therapy for tinea capitis in children (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.81, 1.05]3 studies · 615 participantsModerate
Complete cure for fluconazole vs griseofulvin
Proportion of participants with complete cure · children with tinea capitis
Complete cure for fluconazole showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with complete cure compared with griseofulvin (low certainty).
Systemic antifungal therapy for tinea capitis in children (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.77, 1.46]1 study · 361 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Systemic antifungal therapy for tinea capitis in children
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.