Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

19 questions · 20 findings · 4 reviews

No studies found 3 · 15%GRADE not reported 1 · 5%Very low 10 · 50%Low 6 · 30%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

G‐CSF vs no treatment or placebo

Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ unselected or unstated IVF number · Subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction

G‐CSF showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy rate ‐ unselected or unstated IVF number compared with no treatment or placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

G‐CSF vs no treatment or placebo

Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ women with thin endometrium · Subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction

G‐CSF showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy rate ‐ women with thin endometrium compared with no treatment or placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

G‐CSF + standard treatment vs usual care

improvement of infection clinical and microbiological assessment · patients with diabetic foot infection

G‐CSF + standard treatment may leads to higher improvement of infection clinical and microbiological assessment compared with usual treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention vs control

Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) versus placebo · people undergoing liver transplantation

It is very uncertain whether intervention changes granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) versus placebo compared with control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review