Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

10 questions · 10 findings · 2 reviews · Anaesthesia · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 10%Low 2 · 20%Moderate 7 · 70%High 0 · 0%

Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics

Total blood loss ‐ children · patients undergoing FESS

1 finding from 1 review

Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Very low

Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics

Total blood loss ‐ adults · patients undergoing FESS

1 finding from 1 review

Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 88 participants
Moderate

Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics

Quality of surgical field (0‐5 scales) · patients undergoing FESS

1 finding from 1 review

Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 277 participants
Low

Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics

Operating time · patients undergoing FESS

1 finding from 1 review

Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 214 participants
Low

Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics

Failure of deliberate hypotension (%) · patients undergoing FESS

Propofol probably leads to lower failure of deliberate hypotension (%) compared with inhalation anaesthetics (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.24 [0.09, 0.66]
1 study · 88 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: Mortality · Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent

1 finding from 1 review

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 510 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Primary Outcome: Hypoxaemia · Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent

1 finding from 1 review

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 510 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Primary Outcome: Hypotension · Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent

1 finding from 1 review

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 510 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: Failure to complete procedure (due to sedation‐related problems) · Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent

1 finding from 1 review

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 360 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Secondary outcome: Recovery · Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent

1 finding from 1 review

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 359 participants
Moderate