Cochrane · systematic review · CD007274
Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Garewal, D, Powell, S, Milan, SJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 5 · 100%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: Adults (over 18 years) with requirement for an ERCP procedure with diagnostic intent
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome: Mortality | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 510 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Primary Outcome: Hypoxaemia | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 510 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Primary Outcome: Hypotension | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 510 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Primary outcome: Failure to complete procedure (due to sedation‐related problems) | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 360 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Secondary outcome: Recovery | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 359 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |