Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 3 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 62.5%Very low 2 · 25%Low 1 · 12.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Early loading vs Conventional loading · Implant failure
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  1 year
  RR 1.55 [0.46, 5.18]
  2 studies
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Early loading vs Conventional loading · Marginal bone level changes
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  1 year
  MD -0.04 [-0.15, 0.07]
  2 studies
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Early loading vs Conventional loading · Prosthesis failure
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  1 year
  RR 5.00 [0.63, 39.67]
  1 study · 48 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Early loading of mini-screw implant vs Delayed loading of mini-screw implant · Success of the anchorage device
  Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
  RR 1.00 [0.83, 1.20]
  2 studies · 36 participants
  GRADE not reported
Related · question page
- Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces · Early implant failure
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
  before prosthetic loading · turned vs roughened surfaces
  RR 2.79 [0.87, 8.90]
  7 studies · 404 participants
  Low

Early loading vs Conventional loading

Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

Early loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 1.55 [0.46, 5.18]
2 studies
GRADE not reported

Early loading vs Conventional loading

Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

Early loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
MD -0.04 [-0.15, 0.07]
2 studies
GRADE not reported

Early loading vs Conventional loading

Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

It is very uncertain whether early loading changes prosthesis failure compared with conventional loading (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 5.00 [0.63, 39.67]
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

Early loading of mini-screw implant vs Delayed loading of mini-screw implant

Success of the anchorage device · Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment requiring surgical (mini-screw implant) anchorage

Early loading of mini-screw implant showed no clear difference in success of the anchorage device compared with delayed loading of mini-screw implant; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.00 [0.83, 1.20]
2 studies · 36 participants
GRADE not reported

Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces

Early implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

Turned (smoother) implant surfaces showed no clear difference in early implant failure compared with roughened implant surfaces (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
before prosthetic loading · turned vs roughened surfaces
RR 2.79 [0.87, 8.90]
7 studies · 404 participants
Low

Immediate loading vs Early loading

Prosthesis failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

It is very uncertain whether immediate loading changes prosthesis failure compared with early loading (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 0.69 [0.25, 1.87]
4 studies · 408 participants
Very low

Immediate loading vs Early loading

Marginal bone level change · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

Immediate loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
MD -0.06 [-0.16, 0.03]
3 studies
GRADE not reported

Immediate loading vs Early loading

Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants

Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with early loading; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 0.65 [0.26, 1.64]
5 studies
GRADE not reported