Question · asked by 1 review

Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces: Early implant failure

Population
Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
Intervention
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces
Comparison
Roughened implant surfaces
Outcome
Early implant failure

Turned (smoother) implant surfaces showed no clear difference in early implant failure compared with roughened implant surfaces (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces vs Roughened implant surfaces
Early implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed dental implants, functionally loaded and followed… · before prosthetic loading, turned vs roughened surfaces
Turned (smoother) implant surfaces showed no clear difference in early implant failure compared with roughened implant surfaces (low certainty).
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 2.79 [0.87, 8.90]7 studies · 404 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
2014-01Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.