evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

14 questions · 14 findings · 2 reviews · Eyes and Vision · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 5 · 35.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 28.6%Low 3 · 21.4%Moderate 2 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Blue‐light filtering intraocular lenses (IOL) vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Colour discrimination, measured as the proportion of eyes that had a measurable loss from baseline using Farnsworth‐Munsell 100‐hue colour test score under photopic conditions at six months · adults undergoing cataract surgery with IOL implantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Blue‐light filtering intraocular lenses (IOL) vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable causal link with the study interventions at six months · adults undergoing cataract surgery with IOL implantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Colour discrimination, measured as the proportion of eyes that had a measurable loss from baseline using Farnsworth‐Munsell 100‐hue colour test score under photopic conditions at six months · adults

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non blue‐light filtering IOL

Proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable causal link with the study interventions at six months · adults

Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses may leads to lower proportion of participants with adverse events with a probable… compared with non‐blue‐light filtering lenses (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review