Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non blue‐light filtering IOL: Proportion of eyes or individuals that developed macular structural changes
- Population
- adults
- Intervention
- Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses
- Comparison
- non blue‐light filtering IOL
- Outcome
- Proportion of eyes or individuals that developed macular structural changes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings 1: blue‐light filtering lenses vs non‐blue‐light filtering lenses Proportion of eyes or individuals that developed macular structural changes · adults The review found no eligible studies for this question. Blue‐light filtering spectacle lenses for visual performance, sleep, and macular health in adults (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue‐light filtering spectacle lenses for visual performance, sleep, and macular health in adults 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.