Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,018 questions · 3,100 findings · 369 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 774 · 25%GRADE not reported 108 · 3.5%Very low 727 · 23.5%Low 840 · 27.1%Moderate 474 · 15.3%High 177 · 5.7%

Intervention not reported

TXA given intravenously and intra‐articularly at a total dose of greater than 3 g pre‐incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively · individuals undergoing planned hip or knee replacement surgery Interventions: antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid, aprotinin or…
1 finding from 1 review

Skin‐sparing mastectomy vs conventional mastectomy

Overall survival,assessed as time to any death · people with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer

It is very uncertain whether skin‐sparing mastectomy changes overall survival,assessed as time to any death compared with conventional mastectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Skin‐sparing mastectomy vs conventional mastectomy

Overall complications,assessed using the number of participants with at least one local or systemic complication · people with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer

It is very uncertain whether skin‐sparing mastectomy changes overall complications,assessed using the number of participants with… compared with conventional mastectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Vision‐related patient‐reported outcome measurement at 6 months (the greater the score, the better) · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Clinical measures, such as reading speed or reading acuity at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Telerehabilitation vs self‐training

Device abandonment rate at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…

It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes device abandonment rate at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review