Operating time · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Amount of blood loss · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Reoperation · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with FUSION (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION may leads to higher operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total operative and perioperative blood loss (mL) ( · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in mL compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function (overall) Various tools · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
Intramedullary fixation may leads to higher function or disability (overall) Various tools (Constant score and… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with 15 being the best positive score · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical healing ‐ time to clinical/radiographic fracture consolidation (weeks) · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes clinical healing ‐ time to clinical/radiographic fracture… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ total of adverse events (various: mainly infection; cosmetic result ‐ e.g. prominent metalwork ‐ and symptomatic hardware) · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes adverse events ‐ total of adverse events (various: mainly infection;… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life ‐ not measured · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Return to previous activities ‐ not measured · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Relief of pain · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
Endoscopy probably leads to higher pain relief ‐ middle‐term compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Mortality ‐ not reported · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not measured · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency (new onset) · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
Surgery may leads to lower endocrine pancreatic insufficiency (new onset) compared with conservative treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (new onset) · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
Surgery may leads to lower exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (new onset) compared with conservative treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major complications and mortality · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of Life: SF‐36 (physical component) · participants with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
1 finding from 1 review