SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION vs fusion: Amount of blood loss
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION vs FUSION Blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L · patients with lumbar spinal stenosis It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L compared with FUSION (very low certainty). Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 383 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.