Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

606 questions · 682 findings · 77 reviews

No studies found 99 · 14.5%GRADE not reported 215 · 31.5%Very low 197 · 28.9%Low 102 · 15%Moderate 48 · 7%High 21 · 3.1%

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings leads to lower number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with autologous fascial slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal

Pulp exposure during caries removal · Children (3-11 years) with symptomless, vital dentine caries in primary molars

Stepwise excavation reduced the reported risk of pulp exposure by 69% versus complete caries removal (RR 0.31; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE) vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal

Pulp exposure during caries removal · Children with dentine caries in primary and permanent teeth

Partial caries removal was reported to reduce pulp-exposure risk by 77% versus complete caries removal (RR 0.23; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Selective carious tissue removal (selective excavation, SE) vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal

Pulp exposure during caries removal · Children (3-11 years) with symptomless, vital dentine caries in primary molars

Partial caries removal reduced the reported risk of pulp exposure versus complete caries removal in primary teeth (RR 0.24; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic antibiotics vs placebo or no treatment

Mesh exposure · women with urinary stress incontinence undergoing continence surgery

It is very uncertain whether prophylactic antibiotics (single or combined drugs) changes number of mesh exposures within six weeks after the operation compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride-containing dental care products (mainly fluoride toothpaste) vs Dietary fluoride sources (drinking water, beverages, food)

Contribution of dental care products to total fluoride exposure · Pregnant and lactating women

No study has explored the contribution of dental care products to total fluoride exposure in pregnant and lactating women.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis · children 9 months to 15 years old

The intervention may leads to lower cohort studies postexposure prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids vs usual care

Adverse effects: exposure keratopathy · patients age 10 years and older with periorbital or orbital cellulitis

It is very uncertain whether standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids changes adverse effects: exposure keratopathy compared with standard treatment alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adalimumab vs placebo

Failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic response with prior TNF‐α antagonist exposure · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

Adalimumab probably leads to lower failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic response with prior TNF‐α… compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review