Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,773 questions · 1,817 findings · 212 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 383 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 192 · 10.6%Very low 472 · 26%Low 444 · 24.4%Moderate 228 · 12.5%High 98 · 5.4%

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.1.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Independence in ADL scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 103 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.1 Includes functional training versus does not include functional training Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 188 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.2 Includes neurophysiological versus does not include neurophysiological Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 506 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 81 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Motor function scales Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
25 studies · 4558 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Motor function scales Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 1829 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Balance ( · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Gait velocity Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 292 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Gait velocity Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 271 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Length of stay · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 318 participants
Low

Octylcyanoacrylate vs butylcyanoacrylate

Wound dehiscence · people with surgical incisions

Octylcyanoacrylate showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with butylcyanoacrylate (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.46 [0.19, 11]
2 studies · 80 participants
Low

Octylcyanoacrylate vs butylcyanoacrylate

Wound infection · people with surgical incisions

Octylcyanoacrylate showed no clear difference in wound infection compared with butylcyanoacrylate (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.63 [0.21, 1.88]
1 study · 37 participants
Low

Induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) vs propofol + N2O

Number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting (postoperative care unit) · paediatric

Induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) may leads to higher postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with propofol + N2O (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 2.96 [1.35, 6.49]
4 studies · 176 participants
Low

Induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) vs propofol + N2O

Postoperative behavioural disturbances Different scales · paediatric

It is very uncertain whether induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) changes postoperative behavioural disturbances Different scales compared with propofol + N2O (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 2.67 [1.14, 6.23]
4 studies · 176 participants
Very low

Induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) vs propofol + N2O

Intraoperative and postoperative respiratory and cardiovascular complications · paediatric

It is very uncertain whether induction and maintenance: sevoflurane + nitrous oxide (N2O) changes intraoperative and postoperative respiratory and cardiovascular… compared with propofol + N2O (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.75 [0.27, 2.13]
3 studies · 130 participants
Very low

Paracervical vs placebo

Pain dilating cervix · patients with cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

1 finding from 1 review

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 381 participants
High

Paracervical vs systemic analgesia

Pain during uterine intervention · patients with cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

1 finding from 1 review

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 402 participants
Low

Paracervical vs systemic analgesia

Postoperative pain · patients with cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

1 finding from 1 review

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 984 participants
High

Paracervical vs systemic analgesia

Need for analgesic prescription for pain (supplemental analgesic requirements) · patients with cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

1 finding from 1 review

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 166 participants
Low

Paracervical vs placebo

Pain during uterine intervention ‐ Risk of any pain · patients with cervical dilatation and uterine intervention

Paracervical showed no clear difference in pain during uterine intervention ‐ Risk of any pain compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.85 [0.54, 1.34]
2 studies · 242 participants
Low