Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.19-1.82) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries (by severity) · Human subjects stratified by dental caries severity and caries-free controls
rs1126478 was inversely associated with low-level dental caries in a single study (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90; ungraded).
6 findings from 1 review
OR 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 1.20 [0.94, 1.54]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 1.04 [0.80, 1.34]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Show 3 more findings
OR 0.78 [0.70, 0.87]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 0.72 [0.65, 0.80]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 1.88 [1.50, 2.37]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children aged 6 years or younger (preschool children)
Adjusted analyses also showed no association between low birth weight and early childhood caries (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.57); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Incidence of microleakage · Human teeth requiring cavity preparation and restoration (in vitro)
At the dentin margin, microleakage did not differ significantly between bur and Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.67-2.38; ungraded).
4 findings from 1 review
RR 1.26 [0.67, 2.38]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
RR 1.27 [0.44, 3.67]
5 studies
GRADE not reported
RR 1.03 [0.85, 1.25]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Show 1 more finding
RR 0.87 [0.60, 1.27]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Anatomic form success rate · Children with primary molars requiring proximal (Class II) restorations
The pooled 24-month anatomic form success rate was 0.901 (95% CI 0.845-0.938; ungraded).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion 0.901 [0.845, 0.938]
24 studies
GRADE not reported
Proportion 0.876 [0.817, 0.919]
29 (24 observed + 5 imputed) studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.24-3.58); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 6.17, 95% CI 0.41-92.05) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
8 findings from 1 review
Show 5 more findings
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.49-3.30) in the Age group: Adults subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Caries incidence of first permanent molars (FPMs) · Generally healthy children aged 6 to 9 years with at least one fully erupted first permanent molar with deep fissures or early enamel…
After excluding the high-risk-of-bias study (Bravo 1996), fluoride varnish and fissure sealant did not differ in caries incidence of FPMs and heterogeneity fell to 0% (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.22; 5 RCTs; ungraded).
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of ENAM rs3796704 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03-2.17) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.29) in the Ethnicity: Asian subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 5.12, 95% CI 0.09-278.85) in the Control group: Caries-free subgroup; certainty not graded.
8 findings from 1 review
Show 5 more findings
Caries incidence (proportion of enrolled children developing dentin caries, ICDAS 4-6) · Generally healthy children aged 6 to 9 years with at least one fully erupted first permanent molar with deep fissures or early enamel…
Fluoride varnish and fissure sealant did not differ significantly in the proportion of children developing caries at 2 to 3 years (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.09; 2 RCTs; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.33 (95% CI 0.01 to 12.82).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.33 [0.01, 12.82]
1 study
GRADE not reported