Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,256 questions · 2,339 findings · 262 reviews

No studies found 555 · 23.7%GRADE not reported 398 · 17%Very low 572 · 24.5%Low 476 · 20.4%Moderate 240 · 10.3%High 98 · 4.2%

Supported employment vs other vocational approaches

Employment ‐ obtained any job during the study (high=better) · adults with severe mental illness

It is very uncertain whether supported employment changes employment ‐ obtained any job during the study (high=better) compared with other vocational approaches (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

RDP with I-bar clasps / mesial rests vs RDP with circumferential clasps / distal rests

Change in abutment tooth mobility at 60 months · Partially edentulous patients treated with a removable dental prosthesis (RDP)

RDP with I-bar clasps / mesial rests showed no clear difference in change in abutment tooth mobility at 60 months compared with RDP with circumferential clasps / distal rests; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (porcine; Mucograft) vs Connective tissue autograft (palate)

Keratinised mucosa height change · Patients with implant-supported prostheses and <=1 mm keratinised mucosa

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (porcine; Mucograft) showed no clear difference in keratinised mucosa height change compared with connective tissue autograft (palate); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (porcine; Mucograft) vs Connective tissue autograft (palate)

Recession (aesthetics) · Patients with implant-supported prostheses and <=1 mm keratinised mucosa

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (porcine; Mucograft) showed no clear difference in recession (aesthetics) compared with connective tissue autograft (palate); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

RDP with I-bar clasps / mesial rests vs RDP with circumferential clasps / distal rests

Treatment success rate · Partially edentulous patients treated with a removable dental prosthesis (RDP)

RDP with I-bar clasps / mesial rests showed no clear difference in treatment success (5-year) compared with RDP with circumferential clasps / distal rests; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Vertical GBR with non-resorbable titanium-reinforced barriers vs Vertical GBR with resorbable barriers supported by osteosynthesis plates

Complication at augmented site · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants

Vertical GBR with non-resorbable titanium-reinforced barriers showed no clear difference in complication at augmented site compared with vertical GBR with resorbable barriers supported by osteosynthesis…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review