Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes oxytocin augmentation compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower oxytocin augmentation compared with placebo/no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated showed no clear difference in vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes caesarean section compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes oxytocin augmentation compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes uterine hyperstimulation without FHR changes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated changes admission to NICU compared with oral misoprostol 25 µg two‐hourly static (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.
1 finding from 1 review
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol showed no clear difference in vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with vaginal dinoprostone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
Oral misoprostol probably leads to lower caesarean section compared with vaginal dinoprostone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Spontaneous onset of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Amniotic membranes sweeping may leads to higher spontaneous onset of labour compared with no treatment/sham (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Spontaneous onset of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in spontaneous onset of labour compared with intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Spontaneous onset of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found