Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,783 questions · 10,022 findings · 882 reviews

No studies found 2,100 · 21%GRADE not reported 1,013 · 10.1%Very low 2,237 · 22.3%Low 2,514 · 25.1%Moderate 1,709 · 17.1%High 449 · 4.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Bleeding duration · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Need for and dose of clotting factor concentrates · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions
1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Any postoperative complication except bleeding (e.g. wound infection) · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Number of postoperative bleeding episodes requiring intervention · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic… probably leads to lower number of postoperative bleeding episodes requiring intervention compared with placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Amount of postoperative blood loss (mL) · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions
1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Number of immediate (less than 24 hours) and delayed (24 hours to 10 days) postoperative bleeding episodes requiring intervention · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic acid) vs Placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo)

Side effects or other adverse events · People with haemophilia (A or B) undergoing minor oral surgery or dental extractions

Antifibrinolytic therapy (tranexamic acid or epsilon aminocaproic… showed no clear difference in side effects or other adverse events compared with placebo, no intervention or usual care (with or without placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug

M + GLP1‐A
2 findings from 1 review

Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug

M + DPP4‐I

It is very uncertain whether metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination… changes M + DPP4‐I compared with metformin plus another antidiabetic drug (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug

M + thiazolidinedione

It is very uncertain whether metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination… changes M + thiazolidinedione compared with metformin plus another antidiabetic drug (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug

M + nateglinide
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination therapy vs metformin plus another antidiabetic drug

M + SGLT2‐I

It is very uncertain whether metformin‐sulphonylurea (second‐ or third‐generation) combination… changes M + SGLT2‐I compared with metformin plus another antidiabetic drug (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control

Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (combined time points) · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control

Leaving the study early ‐ for any reason ‐ overall acceptability (combined time points) · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in leaving the study early ‐ for any reason ‐ overall acceptability… compared with control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control

Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… changes adverse events ‐ participants with at least one adverse event ‐ < 12… compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review