Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,970 questions · 2,433 findings · 231 reviews

No studies found 303 · 12.5%GRADE not reported 759 · 31.2%Very low 357 · 14.7%Low 476 · 19.6%Moderate 418 · 17.2%High 120 · 4.9%

Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)

Adverse effect: failure of muscle fusion in the region of the cleft after surgery · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic submucous cleft palate
1 finding from 1 review

Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)

Adverse effect: unacceptable nasal resonance after repair · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic submucous cleft palate

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)

Adverse effect: obstructive sleep apnoea or airway compromise · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic submucous cleft palate
1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated high responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

IU vs 100 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a hyper‐response to stimulation based on at least one ORT measure

Anticipated high responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 100 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated low‐responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

300/450 IU vs 150 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a low‐response to stimulation based on one or more ORT measure

Anticipated low responders: higher showed no clear difference in 300/450 IU vs 150 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated low‐responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

400/450 IU vs 300 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a low‐response to stimulation based on one or more ORT measure

Anticipated low responders: higher showed no clear difference in 400/450 IU vs 300 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated low‐responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

IU vs 450 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a low‐response to stimulation based on one or more ORT measure

Anticipated low responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 450 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated normal responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

IU vs 100 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a normal response to stimulation based on at least one ORT measure

Anticipated normal responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 100 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated normal responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

225/200 IU vs 150 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a normal response to stimulation based on at least one ORT measure

Anticipated normal responders: higher showed no clear difference in 225/200 IU vs 150 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticipated normal responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH

IU vs 225 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a normal response to stimulation based on at least one ORT measure

Anticipated normal responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 225 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review