Anticipated high responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH: IU vs 100 IU
Anticipated high responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 100 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Anticipated high responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH IU vs 100 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a hyper‐response to stimulation based on at least one ORT measure Anticipated high responders: higher showed no clear difference in IU vs 100 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty). Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro… (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.98 [0.66, 1.46] | 1 study · 521 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus… 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.