Question · asked by 1 review
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty): Adverse effect: unacceptable nasal resonance after repair
- Population
- Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic submucous cleft palate
- Intervention
- Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP)
- Comparison
- MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty)
- Outcome
- Adverse effect: unacceptable nasal resonance after repair
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Minimal incision palatopharyngoplasty (MIPP) vs MIPP with additional individualised velopharyngeal surgery (pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty) Adverse effect: unacceptable nasal resonance after repair · Children or adolescents aged 3 years or older with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) associated with non-syndromic… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate (2008) · Cochrane All outcomes | The trial report provided no information on this adverse event; no information on adverse events or serious complications was reported. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the management of submucous cleft palate 2008 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2007-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.