Question · asked by 1 review

Anticipated low‐responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH: 400/450 IU vs 300 IU

Anticipated low responders: higher showed no clear difference in 400/450 IU vs 300 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Anticipated low responders: higher vs lower dose of FSH
400/450 IU vs 300 IU · women undergoing IVF/ICSI who are anticipated to have a low response to stimulation based on one or more ORT measure
Anticipated low responders: higher showed no clear difference in 400/450 IU vs 300 IU compared with lower dose of FSH (low certainty).
Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro… (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.77 [0.19, 3.19]1 study · 62 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus…
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.