SiC30 index score · For interventions, pregnant women, mothers or other caregivers of infants in the first year of life; for outcomes, children up to 6 years…
Package of oral health education/promotion including oral hygiene… led to lower siC30 index score compared with standard care; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Mother caries (dmfs increment) · For interventions, pregnant women and mothers of infants in the first year of life; for outcomes, children up to 6 years of age
Prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) and CHX or iodine-NaF solution… showed no clear difference in mother caries (dmfs increment) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Outcomes · stage I rectal cancer in adults
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease-free survival · stage I rectal cancer in adults
Local excision showed no clear difference in disease‐free survival (D‐FS)Â compared with radical resection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sphincter function · stage I rectal cancer in adults
1 finding from 1 review
Cancer‐related survival (C‐RS)Â · stage I rectal cancer in adults
It is very uncertain whether local excision changes cancer‐related survival (C‐RS)Â compared with radical resection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Local recurrence‐free survival · stage I rectal cancer in adults
1 finding from 1 review
Major postoperative complications · stage I rectal cancer in adults
Local excision showed no clear difference in major postoperative complications compared with radical resection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor complications (3 to 6 weeks · stage I rectal cancer in adults
Local excision probably leads to lower minor postoperative complications compared with radical resection (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · stage I rectal cancer in adults
1 finding from 1 review
Respiratory failure · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower respiratory failure compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Need for endotracheal tube ventilation · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower need for endotracheal tube ventilation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Death during study period · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in mortality during study period compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Chronic lung disease · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may leads to lower chronic lung disease compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumothorax · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in pneumothorax compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe (grade 3 or greater) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on cranial ultrasound ‐ not reported · )
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III/IV) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the proportion of women with breast cancer diagnosed at late stage (stage III, IV) Time of outcome assessment: 3 years to 20 years Method of measurement: CBE · health workers
The intervention may leads to lower breast cancer stage at the time of presentation: defined as the… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Accuracy of health worker‐performed CBE Time of outcome assessment: 2 years to 20 years Method of measurement: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value · health workers
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
CBE coverage Time of outcome assessment: 20 years Method of measurement: active surveillance · health workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Completion of · health workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate