Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,432 questions · 1,467 findings · 116 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 232 · 15.8%GRADE not reported 202 · 13.8%Very low 286 · 19.5%Low 327 · 22.3%Moderate 286 · 19.5%High 134 · 9.1%

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy vs current best practice

Rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy probably leads to lower patients with exacerbations treated with oral steroids compared with current best practice (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy vs current best practice

Fatal serious adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in fatal serious adverse events compared with current best practice (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy vs current best practice

Non‐fatal serious adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (non‐fatal) compared with current best practice (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy vs current best practice

Withdrawals due to adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy probably leads to higher discontinuation due to adverse events compared with current best practice (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single inhaler therapy vs fixed dose ICS

Hospital admissions due to exacerbations: number of participants · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

Single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in patients with exacerbations causing hospitalisation compared with fixed dose ICS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single inhaler therapy vs fixed dose ICS

Rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS

Single inhaler therapy leads to lower patients with exacerbations treated with oral steroids compared with fixed dose ICS (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: ACT vs CQ

Effective treatment of the blood stage parasite As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia before day 28 · Adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria

Summary of findings: ACT showed no clear difference in effective treatment of the blood stage parasite As assessed by:… compared with CQ (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: ACT vs CQ

Post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia between day 28 and day 42/56/63 · Adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria

Summary of findings: ACT may leads to lower post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia… compared with CQ (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: DHA‐P vs alternative ACTs

Effective treatment of the blood stage parasite As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia before day 28 · Adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria

Summary of findings: DHA‐P probably leads to lower effective treatment of the blood stage parasite As assessed by:… compared with alternative ACTs (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: DHA‐P vs alternative ACTs

Post treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia between day 28 and 42 · Adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria

Summary of findings: DHA‐P may leads to lower post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia… compared with alternative ACTs (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids ‐ adults · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief leads to lower patients with exacerbations requiring oral steroids compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Patients with serious adverse events · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief showed no clear difference in patients with serious adverse events compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Patients with severe exacerbations (requiring hospitalisation or ER visit) · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief leads to lower patients with severe exacerbations (requiring hospitalisation or ER… compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review