Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings: ACT vs CQ: Post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia between day 28 and day 42/56/63

Summary of findings: ACT may leads to lower post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia… compared with CQ (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings: ACT vs CQ
Post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia between day 28 and day 42/56/63 · Adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria
Summary of findings: ACT may leads to lower post‐treatment prophylaxis As assessed by: Recurrent parasitaemia… compared with CQ (low certainty).
Artemisinin‐based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.27 [0.08, 0.94]1 study · 376 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Artemisinin‐based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria
2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.