Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,315 questions · 23,557 findings · 2,311 reviews

No studies found 4,183 · 17.8%GRADE not reported 3,930 · 16.7%Very low 5,371 · 22.8%Low 5,787 · 24.6%Moderate 3,320 · 14.1%High 966 · 4.1%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy vs sham

Pain Pressure pain threshold (PPT) ( · people with postburn pruritus

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy may leads to higher pain Pressure pain threshold (PPT) ( compared with sham (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse events: preterm delivery · women undergoing assisted reproduction

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma may leads to higher adverse events: preterm delivery compared with no intervention or placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy compared with intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor

Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes clinical pregnancy compared with intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes live birth (or ongoing pregnancy) compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes clinical pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse event ‐ multiple pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: multiple pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or no intervention

Adverse events: ectopic pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

It is very uncertain whether intrauterine infusion/injection of autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events: ectopic pregnancy compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Any alternative model of care vs usual care

Adherence to clinical guideline‐recommended care: proportion of residents with adequate antidepressant therapy at longest · Nursing home residents (mean age 78.3 to 86.0 years; more than 66% women; 62.1% to 87.3% with dental prostheses)

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Any alternative model of care changes adherence to clinical guideline‐recommended care: proportion of… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LipiFlow vs thermostatic devices

Mean change from baseline in meibomian gland expression scores at 1 to 4 weeks (higher is favored) · people with dry eye

LipiFlow showed no clear difference in mean change from baseline in meibomian gland expression scores at 1… compared with thermostatic devices (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Overweight/obesity (combined) vs Normal Weight or Non‐Obese

Dental caries prevalence · Brazilian children under 5 years in primary dentition (BMI classified by WHO 2006 Z-score)

The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of overweight/obesity on caries odds in the primary dentition (WHO 2006 Z-score; very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review