What do systematic reviews say?

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 382 participants
  Low

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 76 participants
  Low

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 67 participants
  Low

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Dietary interventions vs standard practice

• Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Group‐format behavioural programmes vs alternative support

Group‐format behavioural programmes showed no clear difference in group programme compared to face‐to‐face individual intervention compared with alternative support (moderate certainty).

• Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.76, 1.28]
  6 studies · 980 participants
  Moderate

Group‐format behavioural programmes vs alternative support

Group‐format behavioural programmes may leads to higher group programme versus 'no intervention' controls compared with alternative support (low certainty).

• Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.6 [1.8, 3.76]
  9 studies · 1098 participants
  Low

Supportive intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 470 participants
  Low

Supportive intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 294 participants
  Very low

Supportive intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  13 studies · 1426 participants
  Moderate

Supportive intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 735 participants
  High

Supportive intervention vs control

Supportive intervention may leads to higher 2.3 N deemed adherent (≥ four hours/night) compared with control (low certainty).

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.68 [1.08, 2.6]
  2 studies · 376 participants
  Low

Supportive intervention vs control

Supportive intervention showed no clear difference in 2.4 Withdrawals compared with control (low certainty).

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.27 [0.97, 1.66]
  11 studies · 1702 participants
  Low

Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 134 participants
  Low

Educational intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  10 studies · 1128 participants
  Very low

Educational intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 698 participants
  Very low

Educational intervention vs control

It is very uncertain whether educational intervention changes 1.3 N deemed adherent (≥ four hours/night) compared with control (very low certainty).

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 2.58 [1.5, 4.44]
  7 studies · 1019 participants
  Very low

Educational intervention vs control

• Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 1745 participants
  GRADE not reported