Supportive intervention vs control: N deemed adherent (≥4 hours/night)
Supportive intervention may leads to higher 2.3 N deemed adherent (≥ four hours/night) compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Supportive intervention vs control 2.3 N deemed adherent (≥ four hours/night) · adults with obstructive sleep apnoea Supportive intervention may leads to higher 2.3 N deemed adherent (≥ four hours/night) compared with control (low certainty). Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.68 [1.08, 2.6] | 2 studies · 376 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.